{"id":49610,"date":"2026-04-08T16:49:16","date_gmt":"2026-04-08T16:49:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/christiancorner.us\/index.php\/2026\/04\/08\/t-mobile-fails-to-give-verizon-a-taste-of-its-own-medicine-2\/"},"modified":"2026-04-08T16:49:38","modified_gmt":"2026-04-08T16:49:38","slug":"t-mobile-fails-to-give-verizon-a-taste-of-its-own-medicine-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/christiancorner.us\/index.php\/2026\/04\/08\/t-mobile-fails-to-give-verizon-a-taste-of-its-own-medicine-2\/","title":{"rendered":"T-Mobile fails to give Verizon a taste of its own medicine"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n<\/p>\n

\n
\n
<\/picture>\n
\n

Edgar Cervantes \/ Android Authority<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

TL;DR<\/p>\n

    \n
  • T-Mobile came under criticism for its marketing practices last year, although the National Advertising Division ultimately ruled in favor of its competition.<\/li>\n
  • T-Mobile attempted to bring its own counter-complaints against Verizon’s marketing practices.<\/li>\n
  • The NAD has now ruled in Verizon’s favor, determining that Verizon’s promotions did not cross the same threshold as some previously alleged complaints against T-Mobile.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n
    \n

    Last year, AT&T and Verizon both went after T-Mobile for alleged false advertising claims regarding how it markets some of its promotions. Ultimately, the neutral national advertising division sided with T-Mobile’s competitors on several issues.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \n
    \n

    Don’t want to miss the best of Android Authority<\/em>?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \"Google<\/picture>\"Google<\/picture><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
    \n

    T-Mobile specifically went after Verizon, as it claimed that its own $25 for 4 lines promotion did not clearly indicate that the promotion was limited to 36-months only. After asking the NAD to adjudicate the issue expeditiously, the division ruled in Verizon’s favor.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    The NAD determined that Verizon’s offer did not exceed any threshold because it was not a short-term teaser offer that immediately fades away from customers after a few months. This is because the three-year price guarantee is “consistent with reasonable consumer expectations that wireless rates can adjust over the long term.”<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    Ultimately, this is just another chapter in the internal carrier wars. What does this mean specifically for customers? Honestly, not much.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \n

    Still, the decision is probably a net positive for customers in the long run, as it means T-Mobile has stronger competition than it would have had Verizon been pressured to change its most popular promotion. More competition only leads to better promotions in the long run.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

    \n
    \n

    Thank you for being a part of our community. Please read our comment policy before posting.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    Edgar Cervantes \/ Android Authority TL;DR T-Mobile came under criticism for its marketing practices last year, although the National Advertising Division ultimately ruled in favor of its competition. T-Mobile attempted to bring its own counter-complaints against Verizon’s marketing practices. The NAD has now ruled in Verizon’s favor, determining that Verizon’s promotions did not cross the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":49612,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[58],"tags":[2014,3482,4183,6991,16757,18162],"class_list":["post-49610","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-devotionals","tag-fails","tag-give","tag-medicine","tag-taste","tag-tmobile","tag-verizon"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/christiancorner.us\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49610","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/christiancorner.us\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/christiancorner.us\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christiancorner.us\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christiancorner.us\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49610"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/christiancorner.us\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49610\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49613,"href":"https:\/\/christiancorner.us\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49610\/revisions\/49613"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christiancorner.us\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/49612"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/christiancorner.us\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49610"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christiancorner.us\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49610"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/christiancorner.us\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49610"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}