Former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is currently facing an unprecedented issue in his love life, and it involves allegations made by Ruby Rose against his leading lady Katy Perry.
The news has been shared with celebrity news reporter Rob Shooter and his source admitted on his Naughty But Nice Substack that the whole thing is freaking them out.
According to the report, “He does not believe the allegations for a moment. He believes them to be unfair and very damaging.”
There are also reports that some people within him are angry but Trudeau is standing firmly. According to the same insider, she has decided not to question him, but to defend him “personally – completely” when it comes to support.
So “you won’t see him doing interviews about this,” the insider explained. “He believes remaining silent is the wisest move right now.”
But that doesn’t mean he’s not trying to convince those around him, as he says he’s telling friends “It doesn’t match the woman he knows. To him, it just doesn’t match it.”
Overall, when it comes to their bond and relationship “it’s a huge test, and he’s choosing loyalty.”
Furthermore, at the same time “he understands how serious it is. But his instinct is to protect her, not escalate things publicly. He’s doing everything he can – just being very, very calm about it.”
For those who are still unaware of this allegation tmz “The incident occurred at a licensed premises in the Central Business District.”
Rose also came forward herself on the threads and says that during a night out at a nightclub in Australia, Perry “rubbed her disgusting vagina on my face”, only stopping when she was close to vomiting.
However, Perry has denied all of this through her rep, who, speaking to the same outlet, revealed, “The allegations being circulated on social media by Ruby Rose about Katy Perry are not only patently false, they are dangerous reckless lies.”
“Ms. Rose has a well-documented history of making serious public allegations on social media against various individuals, whose claims have been repeatedly refuted by those named.”
