King Charles has come under criticism over his approach to dealing with those who threaten the royal family’s existence at this time, regardless of their position in the family tree.
European Editor at Large Tom Sykes is the one who drew attention to this growing issue in an article The Daily Beast.
In his view, “the human impulse is easy to understand,” after all Charles “has always taken great pains to remind us that he is a person, that he is kind, that he has a soul”. Furthermore, as Mr. Sykes points out, “Any parent would want to be reconciled to their child.”
Furthermore, in the author’s own view “Charles and Harry are very similar in temperament; both impetuous, impatient with the institution. But I think as king, you have to differentiate between what’s good for you as a human being and what’s good for the nation and what’s good for the institution,” he admitted.
Mr Sykes also said before the finale, “Bringing Harry back – everything he said in the episode, everything he said in the Netflix documentary, everything he maintains about how terrible the British royal family is – is going to be incredibly unpopular.”
By doing this Charles “gave him a platform in this way,” as well as “covertly supported him,” and it is being described as “incredibly dangerous” by Mr. Sykes, because “I think it makes Charles look weak. I think it’s unpopular,” he added.
