trump administration rejected Proposal, then overturned after Iranian drone launch murder Americans.
The cost was measured in blood and treasure almost immediately. In the first two days of the war alone, the US lost $5.6 Arab In war material. In the five weeks of Operation Epic Fury alone, the Pentagon fired more than 850 Tomahawk missiles—almost a quarter According to analysts at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, one of the United States’ total Cost Costing approximately $3 billion, a unit price of up to $3.6 million per missile was given.
Washington initially ordered 350 Tomahawks for 2026, which it has since increased More than 1,000 annually under new framework agreements with Raytheon. However, the timeline for achieving that rate is unclear, and the US has already done so Expenditure More than 850 Tomahawks in the first five weeks of the campaign alone.
The economics were brutal from the start: shooting down a $20,000 drone with a multimillion-dollar interceptor is untenable against a comparatively minor adversary like Iran and becomes completely unimaginable in a scenario involving China or Russia.
New drone powers – and America’s place in them
Low-cost, mass-produced drone warfare is reshaping every modern battlefield – and the US isn’t leading it. Iran, Russia, and Ukraine have shown that they can produce thousands, in some cases, millions, of drones annually. The United States has not come close.
Iran’s Shaheed-136 weapon, which costs between $20,000 and $50,000 per unit, has become one of the defining weapons of the 21st century battlefield. Iran supplied designs to Russia, which built its own production. Ecosystem. Russia’s domestically produced version has since taken on a life of its own navigation system upgradeCombat capability expanded, and by early 2026, starlink Connectivity has been added. Moscow has established a production Target Up to 1,000 Geran-2 drones per day.
Ukraine, forced to innovate by necessity, has become the world’s most experienced practitioner in both drone attack and drone defense. More than 160 drone manufacturers are operating in Ukraine have pledged 8 million first-person-view drones to be delivered in 2026 alone. Above 80 percent Russian battlefield casualties now delivered by Ukrainian drones, while drones dominate kill zone Any major offensive operation extending approximately ten miles on either side of the front line becomes exceptionally dangerous.
US went into Iran war with its own version of martyrs – called drones lucasBuilt by Arizona Startup Spectreworks From a reverse-engineered Iranian airframe, costing $35,000 per unit. February 28 saw its first confirmed combat use. full rate ProductionHowever, it had not started yet.
Analysts did not miss the strategic irony: the US attacked Iran using a weapon that was almost entirely derived from Iran’s own signature attack platform.
Kate Bondar, fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, explains cipher brief However, the gap runs deeper than raw production numbers.
“The gap is very real, especially in the category that matters most in modern contingency warfare: cheap, expendable and rapidly replaceable systems,” he said, adding that to truly integrate first-person-view drones into operations, “the volume needs to reach millions.”
The current U.S. plan for about 300,000 small drones by 2027 is a step forward, but “the demand for this kind of warfare is still low,” Bondar said.
Ukrainian class
While Washington spent years deliberating over the acquisition timeline, Kiev was building the most battle-tested drone force on earth. Ukraine’s interception rate against Martyr-class drones now Approach 90 percent – and Kyiv’s target is 95.
Russia has launched About 57,000 Martyr-type drones over Ukrainian cities in four years of war. However, the low-cost defensive solutions developed by Ukraine have never been replicated in the Gulf states or by US forces in the region. When Iran’s drones started arriving en masse, the United States was left out Improve.
Talking to a Ukrainian drone expert cipher brief At the Ground War symposium in Washington, he pointed out that only three countries on the planet can efficiently fight drones – Iran, Russia and Ukraine.
“The Americans have helped produce these interceptors, but they do not have the experience to deploy them,” said the military expert, identified only as Yuri. “Only those directly engaged in combat, like Ukraine, have the understanding and intuition to apply new technology. And that’s changing every day.”
Yuriy, who came to the Ukrainian military with a background in IT and cybersecurity, described a feedback loop that American procurement culture has never had to replicate.
“The best approach is close communication between manufacturers and the military,” he added. “As different types of drones or technologies are used, they require manufacturers to provide faster responses. These upgrade cycles take very little time. That’s why our drones are always up to date.”
Ukraine is now deployed 228 counter-drone experts across five regional partners – Jordan, Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait. Ukrainian experts have also been sent along with Zelensky to protect US military bases in Jordan. confirmation of this More than ten countries requested assistance from Kiev. Trump in the beginning rejected Proposal.
“We don’t need their help with drone defense,” he said. fox news. “We know more about drones than anyone. We actually have the best drones in the world.”
A few days later, Washington reversed its position.
catch up – at war speed
To its credit, the Pentagon has moved with unusual urgency since the gap became undisputed. Travis Metz, Pentagon’s Drone Dominance Program Managertold senators the Defense Department has Committed $1.1 billion will be invested over the next 18 months to purchase drone systems, including 30,000 small, single-attack drones to be delivered to military units over the next five months. Comprehensive drone dominance program aims to achieve more than 300,000 With FY2026 defense budget, low-cost drones by 2027 allotment $13.4 billion for autonomous military systems.
Bondar, however, cautions that ambition and production are different things.
“Success in this field depends on constant iteration,” he explains. “Russia has introduced dozens of modifications to Shahed systems and their employment over time. The United States has moved too slowly for too long, and is still not operating at the required scale or speed.”
Lt. Col. Zahra Matysek, non-resident research fellow at the U.S. Naval War College, explains cipher brief The deeper problem is organizational.
“Russia and Iran treat drones as a consumable item and build their entire kill chain around adaptation and destruction,” he said. “The US spent too long with a boutique mentality: classy platforms, slow procurement, and drones as ISR accessories.”
In Ukraine, drone warfare doctrine is not updated on a doctrinal cycle; It updates on the survival cycle.
“Every three to four months, a new jamming technology or counter-drone strategy forces units to rewrite their fight,” Matysek explained. “Squad leader briefed on new engagement protocols after a bad day.” In the US, doctrinal updates take years.
The Chinese dimension makes all this even more urgent. Matysek points out that the war in the Indo-Pacific will be a drone and missile battle that will dwarf anything seen in the Gulf, with China holding a dominant position in the upstream supply chain – batteries, optical systems and rare earth minerals.
Ukraine has worked hard to distance itself from Chinese drones Component – The share fell from about 97 percent at the beginning of the war to an estimated 38 percent by 2025, according to the Ukrainian Defense Industries Council and the Snake Island Institute. But Chinese supply chains still pass through both sides confrontation.
The United States also faces the same dependency Right now it is trying to increase its scale: China controls the An estimated 90 percent of the global commercial drone market and dominate Producing the batteries, motors, cameras, and flight controllers that form the basis of almost every small drone system in use today.
Matysek adds, “I think the most worrying thing is that in the four weeks of the Iran war, the US military has spent basically four to five days of precision-guided munitions that it would need in a war with China. If there were a war with China next month, the US would only have enough PGMs for a maximum of three days of fighting.”
This model of gaining rights already exists in American history. During World War II, eleven factory The M4 Sherman tank was manufactured using standardized engineering documentation, with approximately 50,000 units produced between 1942 and 1946. The question now is whether, a generation into the drone age, the United States can do it fast enough.
“What matters now is whether these initiatives not only produce inventory, but create a repeatable ecosystem: rapid procurement, operator training, software iteration, battle damage response and industrial learning loops,” says Bondar.
Cipher Brief is committed to publishing multiple perspectives on national security issues presented by deeply experienced national security professionals. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not represent the views or opinions of The Cipher Brief.
Do you have any perspective to share based on your experience in the national security arena? Send it to editor@thecipherbrief.com for consideration for publication.
Read more expert-driven national security insights, perspectives, and analysis at The Cipher Brief
